To: Tim Steadham <tstead@ntirs.org>
From: "Russell D. Hoffman" <rhoffman@animatedsoftware.com>
Subject: Hold your horses, Mr. Steadham
In-Reply-To: <20010713152229.9916.qmail@web9103.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <4.2.0.58.20010713081105.00a294a0@mail.adnc.com>
Mr. Steadham,
Why don't you just hold your horses and wait for my response(s) to your letters of yesterday? You've made so many errors in logical thinking I can't keep up. And don't call me names. You said, yesterday, "I am not calling YOU stupid or anything else derogatory." Well, you're at it again. "denial of common sense" is pretty derogatory and totally inappropriate.
Geez.
-- rdh
At 08:22 AM 7/13/01 , you wrote:
If you still don't think I have proved it then you
obviosuly are in denial of common sense.
My "diabolical" experiemnet would give the worse-case
dose to the entire world. If you disperse it to the
environment, then the amount that each person on
average will intake would be LESS hence LESS dose.
There is NO way that you can justify that when you
average it out (again, the claim is dispersing it
equally to everyone) that the average dose to each
person in the world would be equal to or more than my
"diabolical" experiment.
I don't know why you call it a "diabolical" experiment
becuase it's not an experiment. I do not nor have I
ever proposed doing that.
--- "Russell D. Hoffman"
<rhoffman@animatedsoftware.com> wrote:
> You haven't proved it, and I'm preparing my
> response. What's silly is
> jumping back and forth between the diabolical
> experiment and reality with
> it's environmental dispersal. --rdh
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/