To: Peter de Jager
From: "Russell D. Hoffman"
re: Followup incident of relevance to our email conversation
Date: September 3rd, 1999
Dear Sir,
This relates to our previous emails, I'm sure you'll agree. Especially where I had said something to the effect of "what if something happened in the next week? Would that wake you up?"
Well, I think most reasonable people will see the connection this incident presents to the Y2K-nuclear problem in general -- except the media, of course, will hide it, as Mary Olsen touches on. And you will probably ignore it too, or somehow yet again deny the relevance, as you have all the other warning signs that have happened, which we've posted for you and all to see.
At least the officials "think the plant is stable now" according to the report. How reassuring this time!
Sincerely,
Russell Hoffman
At 03:05 AM 9/3/99 -0400, you wrote:
September 2, 1999
Malfunction Shuts Down Indian Point Nuclear Plant
By DAVID W. CHEN
Emergency officials have temporarily shut down the Indian Point 2
nuclear
power plant in Westchester County after a series of apparent electrical
problems created the most serious situation at the plant in three years,
officials said Wednesday.
The trouble began at 2:30 P.M. Tuesday, when a faulty transmitter
indicated
a problem in the reactor's temperature and pressure readings. The
information, though false, automatically triggered a shutdown of the
plant,
said Michael J. Spall, a spokesman for Consolidated Edison, the plant's
operator. It was the first time in nearly a year that the plant had shut
down.
Then, for about five hours, beginning late Tuesday night, 75 percent of
the
warning lights on the instrument panel in the plant's control room
stopped
working. There were other ways to gauge the plant's operations, but the
loss of the lights meant that emergency officials had to act even more
cautiously in monitoring any further problems in the system, said Neil
Sheehan, a spokesman for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
No radioactive material was released, and the public was never in any
danger, but the county and local officials were informed of the
situation
late Tuesday night, Sheehan said.
It may be at least a few days before the plant can resume operating,
Spall
said. In the interim, Con Edison will use other sources of energy to
serve
its three million customers in New York City and Westchester County.
But in what Sheehan described as a rare move, the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission is sending an inspection team of four experts to try to
determine what went wrong at the plant, which is 35 miles north of
Manhattan, in the village of Buchanan.
"We think the plant is stable now," Sheehan said late Wednesday. "But
it's
obviously something we want to investigate vigorously."
The situation required Indian Point officials to declare what in nuclear
power parlance is called a "notification of an unusual event." That
designation represents the first of four levels of emergency for a
nuclear
plant. And while the fourth level has been reached only once in United
States history -- the Three Mile Island accident in 1979 -- the first
level
is rare, too. There were only two such notifications around the country
in
1998, and three the previous year.
The last time the Indian Point 2 plant had to declare an "unusual event"
was in December 1996, when there was a small spill of some chemicals on
the
site, Spall said. No one was injured.
Indian Point has had its share of mixed news in recent years. In 1994,
the
plant broke the world record for longest continuous operation -- 19
months
-- of a light-water reactor, the kind used in the United States and most
of
the rest of the world. But in 1998, the plant was closed for several
months
because of safety concerns.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroups.com home:
http://www.egroups.com/group/y2k-nuclear
Here is yet another example for us of what false information in a
reactor system can do. Thankfully there was (as far as we know) no
damage to Indian Point reactor, but the story doesn't mention something
that is in the
initial utility reports to NRC: deisel generator malfunction. It is not
clear WHY the diesel back-up power was triggered, since there was no
outage, but one of three (unusual to have 3) diesel generators came on
but didn't power up the things it was supposed to. There is a rumor that
part of the investigation of the event is on Station Blackout
issues...it is important to note that the report is that this situation
has been stabilized.
-- Mary Olson
----------------------
New York Times:
http://www.egroups.com
- Simplifying group communications
Next item (#4)
Last item (#2)
This article has been presented on the World Wide Web by:
The Animated Software Company
http://www.animatedsoftware.com
rhoffman@animatedsoftware.com
First placed online September 22nd, 1999.
Last modified September 22nd, 1999.
Webwiz: Russell D. Hoffman
Copyright (c) Russell D. Hoffman