To: "NASA comments" <comments@www.hq.nasa.gov>
From: "Russell D. Hoffman" <rhoffman@animatedsoftware.com>
Subject: Let's all say GOOD RIDDANCE to NASA's awful Galileo space probe!
In-Reply-To: <BB91F15D.1FFD6%bluespin@earthlink.net>

September 20th, 2003

Dear Readers,

Good riddance to Galileo!

Mentioned in the article shown below about NASA's Galileo space probe is that Galileo was supposed to have been launched on the space shuttle, but the Challenger disaster stopped that.

UNMENTIONED was that Galileo carried 264,400 Curies (49.25 pounds) of Plutonium Dioxide, which was mostly Pu 238, whose lethality per gram (or rather, per fraction of a millionth of a gram, to be more precise) is 280 times more than "regular" plutonium (Pu-239).  Plutonium causes cancer (especially lung cancer), leukemia and birth defects in vanishingly small quantities.  Regular plutonium, Pu-239, is known as "weapons grade plutonium" and is generally considered the deadliest stuff on Earth.  Pu-238 is 280 times worse, for about 1/280th as long.  Pu 238 has a half-life of about 87.75 years. The half-life of Pu 239 is about 24,000 years.  When you spread any form of plutonium around the Earth, it has a lot of chances to get into people's lungs before it all splits into its various daughter products (most of which are also radioactive).

NASA launches plutonium with some regularity, but only the Cassini space probe, launched in 1997 in the face of widespread protests, carried more plutonium aloft at one time than Galileo (unless some secret military flight carried more, which of course we have no way of knowing).

NASA uses plutonium for two purposes: Heat, and electricity.  Most of Galileo's plutonium was used to produce electricity from thermocouples which surround the plutonium fuel.  Plutonium is also used as a heat source to keep scientific equipment at an operable temperature.  Nearly all NASA space probes use plutonium "RHU's" (Radioactive Heater Units), which, while much smaller than RTGs (Radioactive Thermoelectric Generators), still carry tens of millions of lethal doses of plutonium each.  (The most recent Mars probes carried nearly a dozen "RHU" heater units each.)

Each launch is extremely hazardous.  A number of plutonium launches have failed.  In one case, NASA claims it was not a plutonium accident because, according to NASA, the plutonium containment stayed in one piece all the way to Earth (Apollo 13, 1970).  But they don't really know.  In another case, they make the claim that the plutonium wasn't "accidentally" spread around because the containment was designed to spread the plutonium in the upper atmosphere in the event of a unexpected reentry (SNAP 9A, 1964). However, NASA had assured scientists who opposed its launch that SNAP-9A had a "one in ten million" chance of returning to Earth -- vanishingly small odds.  But such odds were utter lies.  (I was told this story many years later by the top radiation scientist in the field at the time, and the man considered "the father of Health Physics", the late Dr. Karl Z. Morgan, who also testified in court about this incident.)

It is reasonable to believe that the real reason NASA launches plutonium into space on these so-called "civilian" missions is as a COVER for their military launches of plutonium.  Without the civilian infrastructure for using plutonium in space, military launches would require a whole lot of additional infrastructure, money, security, and LIES.  Also, as long as the public (that's you and me, the people who breath the carcinogenic dust from NASA's mistakes every day of our lives) allows the "civilian" uses, and don't even know about the military uses, NASA has a green light to do whatever it wants.

For more information about NASA's crazy plutonium policies, please visit my STOP CASSINI web site:
http://www.animatedsoftware.com/cassini/cassini.htm

Also, here's a FLASH animation with a history of NASA's use of plutonium in space, which speculates about what might have been on board Columbia on its last mission:

http://www.animatedsoftware.com/mx/nasa/columbia/index.html
or try:
http://www.animatedsoftware.com/mx/nasa/columbia/index.swf

One can assume the real reason they are now smashing Galileo into Jupiter instead of into one of her moons is to hide their evil tracks, so it will not be possible to send a probe to Galileo's wreckage, to find out that the containment system has become dust, and the plutonium has spread all over the moon on which it crashed, a perfect example (because it's safely billions of miles away) of what happens here on Earth whenever NASA screws up.

Sincerely,

Russell Hoffman
Concerned Citizen
Carlsbad, CA

This letter will be available online here:
http://www.animatedsoftware.com/cassini/cass2003/good_riddance_galileo.htm

At 11:58 AM 9/20/2003 , you wrote:


Galileo: Breaking Up's Hard to Do

By Suneel Ratan

Story location: http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,60520,00.html

02:00 AM Sep. 20, 2003 PT

When the Galileo spacecraft slams into Jupiter on Sunday, one of the
longest-running dramas in the history of space exploration will come to an
end.

For the 800 or so people who have worked on the mission since its inception
in the mid-1970s, the occasion will be bittersweet.
                  
Many of them will be among 1,500 people expected to congregate at the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, for what amounts to a funeral
for a much-loved, soon to be long-lost friend.

Dr. Claudia Alexander recalls beginning her career in 1986 at the age of 26
as an instrument specialist for Galileo. Now 44, she is the last of
Galileo's
project managers -- NASA-ese for head honcho.

"Sometimes it's like an old car that's giving you everything it can give
you, and other times I think of it like your troubled kid that ended up
getting graduated from Harvard," Alexander said.

On Friday, as Galileo's end neared, mission team members expressed a broad
range of emotions.

Systems engineer Nagin Cox fought off tears. But Kathy Schimmels, 32, one of
the youngest Galileans, conveyed an exuberant sense of celebration of the
craft's long and storied life.

"I'm excited for the final hurrah," said Schimmels, who joined the team in
1996, fresh out of a master's program at the University of Colorado,
Boulder. "I'm going to miss working on it, but we've got to celebrate the
life it had."

Sunday's reunion of team members will include reminiscing about a mission
that at times seemed cursed, but in the end went beyond NASA's expectations
that it would be the first to explore the complex environment of the solar
system's biggest planet.

The mission was designed to head straight to Jupiter after being lofted from
a space shuttle flight in 1986. However, the Challenger shuttle disaster
earlythat year scuttled that plan.

The flight path was redesigned as a six-year odyssey with two flybys of
Earth and one of Venus in order to use the gravity of those planets as
slingshots toward the outer solar system.

Galileo launched in 1989 from aboard the shuttle Atlantis. But as it neared
Jupiter, disaster struck. The craft's high-gain antenna got stuck, likely
because of the years it spent in storage. The remaining antenna could only
transmit data home at the rate of 10 bits per second.

Faced with a crippled mission, engineers and scientists embarked on the
risky course of rewriting Galileo's software so it could run on faster
data-compression algorithms.

"Now it's standard practice to do post-launch updates of flight software,"
said engineer Cox, who is working on the upcoming Mars Exploration Rover
mission. "We take for granted something that Galileo pioneered."

With that near-death experience behind it, Galileo arrived at Jupiter and
began sending back images and data that made scientists' jaws drop. The show
began en route, as Galileo passed two asteroids and watched as comet
Shoemaker-Levy smashed into Jupiter.

Galileo carried a probe that dove into Jupiter itself, giving scientists a
better sense of the gas giant's weather patterns and upper atmosphere. The
craft staged flybys of big moons like Europa, Ganymede and Callisto, and
cast its eyes on the volcanoes of Io.

The mission was designed to last two years, but NASA extended it three
times.

The mission had a staff of 367 people when Galileo entered Jupiter's orbit
in 1995, Alexander said. That was cut back to about 60 in the late 1990s. It
had dwindled to half a dozen or so by November, when Galileo performed its
last major observation of the Jovian moonlet, Amalthea.

With its propellant expended and its scientific usefulness exhausted,
Galileo might have died a natural death, drifting around the system until
gravity pulled it into Jupiter or one of its moons.

But NASA decided to kill the craft before it had launched, Alexander said.
At that point, scientists believed Europa was clad in a planetary ocean that
could harbor life. Now, after its 14 years in deep space, they are carrying
out plans to destroy Galileo since it might be carrying microbes from Earth
that could contaminate those oceans.

Galileo's handlers do not need to program any sequences or push any buttons.
The craft was set on its fatal collision course last fall.

Engineer Bruce McLaughlin will arrive at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory on
Saturday afternoon to check on the craft. If everything appears all right,
he'll go home and come back early Sunday morning, when 11 or so others will
join him for the probe's final hours.

The probe is expected to break up at 11:57 a.m. PDT. Traveling at the speed
of light, its telemetry will arrive on Earth about 52 minutes later.

"Monday morning will be interesting," McLaughlin said. "We'll come into work
and there'll be nothing more to do on Galileo except put away
documentation that we no longer need."


GREENACTION is an email newsletter featuring stories, and announcements
focused on natural and social ecologies of the north SF Bay area- with
reference to the global systems of which we are a part.
All list members are free to post.  No attachments.
To subscribe contact bluespin@earthlink.net


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to [terms]